Ok, Slaughterhouse Sue needs to slowly back away from Facebook. Either that or she needs a brain filter transplant in the worst way. Just like when she encouraged her sycophants to get reach out to the girl who slaughtered her old horse, stripped naked and climbed inside the carcass for some `good, clean, American fun’, she is now rallying the troops to applaud and support Rep. Steve King from Iowa. If not for poor judgement, Ole Suey would have none at all. This is disgusting, even for her.
Since her rise from the ashes of her latest shame, Slaughterhouse Sue has been back online with a vengeance. She is linking articles and writing letter as fast as her fat little fingers can type. I’m almost positive she has even broken a sweat in the past few days she’s been so busy and I can just imagine pork fat and Dorito dust seeping out of her pores. On Monday, she wet her granny panties and posted this:
“FINALLY! SOME ARE STARTING TO GET IT!!!
Rep Steve King of Iowa needs to be APPLAUDED; let’s help him expose the HSUS for what it is, by emailing each and every one of our elected officials, and simply say:
Then CALL or fax your reps’ offices saying the same. If you don’t know who they are, GOOGLE IT or email me.
If we can urge passage of this bill with the King wording, it will SIGNIFICANTLY alter the success of the HSUS against us.
Bear in mind that HSUS will be pulling out all the stops to REMOVE the King language from the bill.
The only way they can be stopped is if WE all get together and tell our reps that we want that wording in there!
PLEASE ACT – its SOOO easy!”
Rep Steve King is the sponsor of a recent amendment to the Farm Bill which basically prevents individual states from developing their own health, safety and cruelty standards even if that is what their voters want. True to form for this type of thing, it was introduced after midnight following a marathon session and was debated for a grand total of 20 minutes. It’s now on its way to the Senate and will be voted on before the end of September when the current bill expires. This amendment opens the door for cruel and horrific farming practices that some states have already chosen to outlaw. Things such as, but not limited to:
- Having pigs confined to gestation crates which prevents them from moving or even being able to turn around. They live their entire lives like this. (Currently banned in 9 states)
- Veal crates where calves are confined so that muscle atrophy improves their taste once they are slaughtered at 4-5 months of age ( Currently banned in 7 states)
- Tail docking of cattle even though the AVMA has called it unneccessary and highly painful (Currently banned in 3 states)
- Adding arsenic to chicken feed which apparently makes their flesh more appealing and may or may not ok for human consumption as arsenic is known to cause cancer. (Banned in Maryland)
- Lifting the ban on foie gras in California so that once again, male geese and ducks can be kept in extreme confinement while being force-fed high fat diets to enlarge their livers prior to slaughter. Most female hatchlings are thrown away….literally.
Slaughterhouse Sue has truly found a kindred spirit in this piece of human excrement. He is well aware of the consequences of this legislation to our food safety and animal welfare too. He gloated that his bill “wipes out everything they’ve [animal rights advocates] done with pork and veal.” Just like Ole Suey, King doesn’t care what agony and torture animals go through as long as their dinner is on the plate and he gets to stick it to Wayne Pacelle and The HSUS. He is in support of puppy mills and in opposition of the Egg Products Inspection Act which would end the extreme and inhumane confinement of laying hens. His amendment will also nullify various state bans on horse slaughter. I’m going to leave a few links at the end of this entry, but to put it in the simplest of terms; If it is harmful and cruel to animals, King is in support of it. If it means a better quality of life for an animal, King is opposed. This guy is crazy and evil.
- He tried to reinstate the `Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy for active military personnel and veterans
- He recently introduced an amendment to the Defense Appropriation Bill that would outlaw gay marriage on military bases.
- He supports state bans on birth control and says that contraceptives are the same thing as abortion.
This guy isn’t just crazy, he’s hateful. This is the person that Slaughterhouse Sue wants her followers to applaud, and some of them do. (“This is awesome!! Proud to be an Iowa girl,lol!“) I don’t know about you, but I can’t live with what this crazy asswad is trying to push through. It’s wrong and it hurts my soul to even think about the sorts of things he is in support of. It’s time to act up. Write letters, make calls, and educate people. There is no time to waste as September will be here all too soon.
I don’t get the sense that Ms Wallis is using ‘poor judgement’ in her support of King. In fact, it’s just more of the same from Wallis and her uber-radical, “don’t-tell-me-what-I-can-do-with-my-animal” group and completely in line with their philosophy regarding the use of animals. For all intents and purposes, there is absolutely *nothing* these folks appear to oppose when it comes to animal cruelty. Of course, they like to pound their chests proclaiming “property rights” in an attempt to paint it as a somehow “American Value” to abuse animals.
If you’ve ever perused the “members” of the United Horsemeat group, you’ll find all kinds of animal exploiters, many of whom have nothing to do with the horse industry. Their lowest common denominator, however, seems to be their defense of some of the most egregious of animal practices. Whether it’s puppymills, industrialized farming practices (battery cages, veal crates, etc.), wild hog fighting (yes, a UH member actually posted a link in support of a group of folks who capture wild hogs and set their dogs on them in a confined arena), horse tripping, etc. One of UH’s most illustrious members is Randy Janssen, a militant defender of horse tripping. His recent post on the UH facebook page announcing their next “charro” complete with horse tripping actually has several “likes” from others in on the page …
At any rate, it’s clear why this group of folks would be fawning over the likes of Steve King — if you really want to throw up a little in your mouth, just listen to the audio interview between Mr King and the Sultan of Slime, Trent Loos.
I did listen to it and it made me just sick. I’m hoping that maybe a few of the fence sitters with a shred of compassion or common sense will back away from the crazy. I really find people with that much hate in them to be quite scary.
OK everyone is misrepresenting the King amendment. I don’t know who copied who, but someone ought to go back and READ the amendment. Let me say I am no supporter of King, but the amendment does nothing to prevent States from making and enforcing their own laws regarding animal protection and cruelty with in their State. What it prevents is States using commerce laws that say what other States should have for their own animal laws. In other words Iowa raised lots of eggs and ships to California. If Californians want Iowa eggs that’s fine. If they don’t like the practices of Iowa’s egg farmers they can get them elsewhere. The amendment prevents California from dictating that Iowa eggs cannot be imported because Iowa standards don’t meed California standards.
Like it or not, King believes animal welfare and cruelty laws are under jurisdiction of each State.
So you’re fine with him saying that California doesn’t want eggs from a state that keeps the hens in cruel conditions? The UEP is NOT behing King. King’s amendment would also mean that the states have no power to ban horse slaughter for human consumption in their own jurisdictions. I did read it and it’s scary.
You’re correct Shedrow. I’ve spoken to two animal law attorneys and Rep King’s amendment could be very problematic for existing state animal welfare laws involving livestock. We should be concerned.
Diana – The wording of the amendment forbids states to “impose a standard or condition on the production or manufacture of any agricultural product sold or offered for sale in interstate commerce” if “such production or manufacture occurs in another state.”
This could easily be interpreted to mean, for example, if eggs are produced by battery caged hens in Iowa, then California would not be able to require California egg producers to use larger cages; essentially nullifying the law to phase out battery cages that was approved and passed by California consumers. Because much of it is written using broad, ill-defined terms (most assuredly intentional) it has serious repercussions for *all* animal welfare legislation.
Frankly, I couldn’t care less if Mr King believes “animal welfare and cruelty laws are under jurisdiction of each State” — his agenda is written by corporate agriculture interests whose goal is to undermine any legislation that hinders their profit margin — they continue to pay millions of dollars for lobbyists and politicians to make sure that State animal cruelty laws are not applied to them – by using the definition of “standard and accepted practice” when raising, feeding, “euthanizing”, or slaughtering an animal — some of these practices would constitute felony animal cruelty charges if inflicted on cats or dogs.
He, along with his supporters, are a disgrace.
The only thing this poor excuse for a human believes in is MONEY. Just like the rest of the Vultures. Disgusting and frightening.
here is what she considered ‘fun’ -she was defending these people.. http://www.practikel.com/2011/10/31/woman-poses-nude-inside-the-dead-carcass-of-a-horse/
Sickening
that could be scary, some of the states have really unbalanced animal-haters elected.
Well he wants individual states to have the right to ban birth control, but not the right to ban foie gras and other cruel practices. He’s a great big stinkin hypocrite.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/31/rep-steve-king-defends-the-right-to-watch-dog-fighting/
http://rtfitchauthor.com/2012/08/01/horse-slaughter-dealt-death-blow-by-eu-regulations/
You’ve been saying it all along, SR, and you were right about the bute. This is good news indeed.
Yes, but the PSAs aren’t too concerned because they figure they’ll just ship it all to Asian countries that don’t have such restrictions. I know that Japan ships live horses to slaughter themselves and I understand they have their own sources and aren’t all that dependent on North American horses as a sole supplier. They still aren’t taking this seriously.
I feel they’re having one of those ‘This can’t be happening to me’ kind of moments. They’re in denial, and I think they’ll stay in denial for a very long time. They won’t win, no matter how much they run around crying foul.
Are they really so sure they know what restrictions Asian countries have? Japan already refuses some of our Ag products – I’m thinking beef, but I could be wrong. Anyway, they’re NOT an open door for anything and everything. The Japanese are not uncivilized ignoramuses, Sue. Sorry to tell you.
and I believe the Mongolians supply their own horse meat and pretty much raise it organically.
Nemesis ~ I agree. They’ve been in denial about the food safety issues the whole time.
So true! Darn the adverse side effects, as long as money can be made! Safety should always be a number one priority, for us, for them, no matter what.
Not too surprising that Sue continues to align herself with her fellow scum of the earth deviants. After all she thinks that kill buyers are heroes. Gag.
Another link: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/07/31/615951/steve-king-dogfighting/?mobile=nc
Slaughterhouse Sue is kinda funny because she’s so dumb, but this man is scary to me. You have to have a special kinda hate to endorse the things he does.
[…] King is all kinds of awesome. Just to refresh your memory on him, you can read this entry (https://shedrowconfessions.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/slaughterhouse-sue-finds-her-soulmate/)All you really need to know about Crazyass, is pretty much an equal opportunity hater. He hates […]
[…] that would give stiffer penalties for animal neglect and abuse, and as we discussed earlier (https://shedrowconfessions.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/slaughterhouse-sue-finds-her-soulmate/), Crazyass King is pretty much down with any form of animal abuse as long as it turns a buck. […]
[…] animal, female or living for that matter. You can read all about his hatefulness right here: (https://shedrowconfessions.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/slaughterhouse-sue-finds-her-soulmate/). Iowa also has fairly strict Ag Gag laws so that any monitoring or attempt to expose abuse and […]
Fastidious respond in return of this issue with real arguments and telling the whole thing regarding that.