As promised, I am finally getting a chance to deal with some other things that have been kicking around on the back burner for a while. If you’re here for HiCaliber fuckery, this isn’t the post for you. If you’re here for drama, this probably won’t be the post for you either. You see, once upon a time, this blog was about no one thing and certainly not even a little bit about HiCaliber. What it was about was a lot about slaughter and other issues in equine welfare that I felt like posting about at any given time. Those were the good old days and aside from the odd troll here and there, things were relatively peaceful and slower paced back then. I do realize that you can’t put a genie back in the bottle, but after almost 2 years of pretty much all HiCaliber, all the time and all the drama and histrionics that entails, it’s time to focus elsewhere for now. Believe it or not there is a great big horse community beyond Southern California and not every horse in trouble is easily found at an auction or with a `notorious’ flipper. Sometimes the threat comes from within and sometimes they walk among us. So, with that in mind, let’s talk about an issue that is troubling to many advocates right now. Let’s talk about The Right Horse Initiative.
I wanna say it was about a year or so ago that I first heard of The Right Horse Initiative. Even from the get go, I looked at it with a very jaundiced eye. You know the old saying about if something sounds too good to be true? It would seem to apply here.
The Right Horse Initiative has the primary goal of increasing the number of horses adopted annually nationwide and a secondary goal of providing more resources in communities to horse owners….will focus on training transition horses for placement in equine-assisted therapy, beginner horsemanship programs or other placement opportunities. The goal of this project is to create an infrastructure in which transition horses receive the care and training required for them to prime candidates for non-traditional adoption or placement opportunities in therapy and/or beginner riding programs.
Sounds pretty awesome, right? Increasing adoptions and community resources is something we should all be able to get on board with. Well, get ready for red flag #1 of many. RHI is piloting a program that sees rescues which they now refer to as `adoption groups’, bringing their `horses in transition’ to regional training hubs. They claim they will make these horses `better trained and more desirable’ which will allow them to be cycled through quicker. The exact verbiage they use is “this increases movement in all the adoption centers and decreases their length of stay while increasing their ability to take on additional horses in transition.” Movement. Interesting phrasing. It’s almost like they are talking about product rather than sentient beings. Still, if this was the only issue, it would be down to semantics. Sadly, it’s not the only issue.
For those readers that have been with me since BHC (Before HiCaliber), you might remember the shit show that was United Horsemen under Sue Wallis and Dave Duquette. Their main mission was to make horse meat happen in America under the guise of giving a shit about the welfare of animals. One of the ways they tried to ram this down the throats of the horse community was the Equine Rescue & Rejuvenation Program. I talked about it all the way back in 2012 on this post. Basically, what they were telling people they wanted to do was have a central hub where people surrendered horses. There, they would be assessed for health, soundness and trainability and then horses they deemed suitable would enter their program. The rest would go straight to a proposed slaughter plant on the very same property. Make no mistake, the mission for Dave and Suey was to get slaughter up and running and the whole rescue facet of this program was basically the bread of the shit sandwich they were serving.
“To rehabilitate horses from an unwanted and at-risk status to a healthy and functional status. We will identify horses with potential, teach them skills, and then offer them to the public. Horses that can be trained, or re-trained for new purposes, will be sold. Horses that demonstrate suitability for purposes such as non-profit therapeutic riding or youth programs will be made available to those groups at little or no cost.”
Am I the only one not finding the United Horsemen’s failed ERRP and RHI mission statements eerily similar? To be fair, RHI is not openly advocating for slaughter. What they are offering is `end of life services’ and on the surface that’s not a bad thing. I am not now, nor have I ever been anti necessary euthanasia. I think the problem with proposed programs like this is that people get euth happy and, RHI seems to place their emphasis on a horse’s ability to be ridden. Most rescues don’t have a huge issue placing good riding horses. That hasn’t classically been the problem area in rescue. From the rescues I have spoken to and dealt with, it’s the pasture puffs and senior horses that are harder to place and I don’t really see RHI addressing this beyond euthanasia.
Another red flag, I have with RHI is the money getting thrown around. They are funded by Watershed Animal Fund which is a division of the Arnall Family Foundation. There seems to be no shortage of cash and they have some rather generous grants available for adoption innovations. For 2019, there are two 25k grants and another for up to 50k. I don’t know about you, but that kinda money tends to buy some loyalty. Who wouldn’t put the RHI logo on their social media if it meant that kind of cash? This is where it gets a bit gray and scary for me. On the surface, it’s completely awesome for a rescue to get a grant of that size, but at what ultimate cost? As far as I can tell, if you get the grant, they kinda own you for at least the next 18 months.
A quick glance at RHI’s listed partners is a major cause for concern. A few of the orgs listed such as NRHA, Equus Film Festival have direct ties to Protect The Harvest which, as most of you know, is one of the major lobby groups working on bringing back slaughter. PTH is also where Duquette landed after Suey fell off her perch. Like RHI, they also like to throw a lot of money around. Equine Sciences at Colorado State is another partner and they lean to the pro slaughter side of things as well. Of the five vets listed on RHI’s advisory council, at least three of them are said to be pro-slaughter, Dr. Tom Lenz being notoriously so. Noticing a pattern here?
In the interest of full disclosure, RHI categorically denies any ties to Protect the Harvest. That could be true, but as we have come to find out, PTH’s tentacles reach far and wide and their logo shows up at all sorts of industry events that you wouldn’t expect them to *cough*EquusFilmFesitval*cough* What I find most interesting about this little threat message is that they do not take a firm anti slaughter stance. They don’t really take any stance at all, but rather indicate that they’ll get in bed with anybody to push their agenda. That’s how I’m reading the highlighted portion anyhow. BTW, this wasn’t sent to me and it’s been posted in many places so let’s not be suing another innocent person in the next attempt to unmask me. That’s getting kinda old.
This is just scraping the surface of my concerns with RHI. There already is a group of advocates that have laid out many of the issues on social media. You can check them out on this Facebook page. They go into far more detail than I have here and will happily answer any questions people may have. I realize that all of this might seem like much ado about nothing or, at the very least, not much, but if I have learned one thing in the past couple of years it is to ask questions if things don’t feel quite right. The response to those questions usually tell you if it’s worth a closer look. I am deeply concerned that The Right Horse Initiative is buying support and, at best, not addressing the issues that will go a long way to improving the conditions for all horses. By not taking an anti-slaughter stance and partnering with pro slaughter orgs and individuals, I worry about what is to come should they gain a strong foothold in the rescue community. There as many ways to `rescue’ as there are rescues, but a common thread should be that the horse comes first and the focus should never be on quantity over quality. Packaging it all up with feel good terms like `horses in transition’ is just lip service. If you want to improve conditions for all horses then get behind the legislation that will CHANGE things for them once and for all. Lean on your lawmakers to enforce existing laws and lobby for ones that have more teeth. We need to focus on the cause rather than putting bandaids on symptoms and, as true advocates, we should always be working our way out of a `job’. What I see with RHI is a lot of people making rescue a business and that may just be the road to ruin.
If RH was truly concerned about horse welfare they would come out strong against horse slaughter and use some of their money to lobby in Washington for the SAFE act. Because they have chosen to side step the slaughter issue most rescues will not trust them or their motives. ASPCA is still lobbying for the SAFE act yet is supporting all of the harm RHI wants us to inflict on horses. So sad what money can buy.
They thought we would all fall into line because refusal would end our grant opportunities with them. We all have other donors we have to answer to. Most equine donors are very informed on slaughter issues and the safe act. Would they continue to donate knowing we partnered with this mostly pro slaughter collective? Would they donate their money to help care for our horses knowing the horses would be adopted out with no protections? There are donors that donate to care for aged horses or companion horses, how would they feel about us not taking in these type of horses and just leaving them out there to head off to slaughter or taking them in an killing them? We have more important and intelligent donors to answer to than this collective.
There are a lot of PHD’s listed behind the names of people involved in creating this collective. You would think with that amount of brain power, effort and money they could have come up with a collective that 100% supports the protections for ALL horses! That’s why it is so obvious RHI/ASPCA are supporting the industries first.
Ugh, another comment lost out in the ethernet somewhere….
I can’t grasp the fact that an essential idea that these “highly educated” people are missing is that by purchasing from a KB, these people might be “saving” a horse, but in doing so they are merely sentencing another unknown, probably unseen horse in its stead.They are lining the pockets of the KB, which allows them to purchase more, and trust me–having been to so many auctions, it is a fact that if the KB’s know that a “bleeding heart,” is trying to fundraise for a horse, then they will continue to upbid the price. The KB’s know when a rescue is “in the house,” and they notify the others. They find it amusing, and know they can already count on additional monies being brought in.
The Colorado horse Rescue Network, of whom I am only acquainted by virtue of my friend Tori, (not endorsing them) seems to have had a sound premise of which I liked. Through networking, they become aware of horses in danger of going to auction, and made arrangements to purchase the horses for a couple of hundred dollars before they ever went to sale. They have, or had, some trainers on their BOD, so the horses went to them to foster and training before they are adopted out. That is a much sounder, and cheaper, way of doing things when one is using donor funds.
I’ve learned several things during my time working on some of these cases, and that is that NONE of these orgs such as HSUS, RHI, among others, have solely the best interests of the horses in mind, and that is not based only on their 990’s.
One case in Oregon, a County refused to seize horses in a neglect situation because they didn’t have the budget to care for all of them, and refused to ask HSUS to step in because the HSUS never reimbursed them for the costs of a previous neglect situation and left them holding all of the bills. Seriously, with all of the money HSUS pulls in…they couldn’t have reimbursed the previous bills to save additional horses from the neglect/hoarding situation going on? The 990’s tell one that very little of the money they bring in goes to save the animals, and after seeing a couple more of these orgs in action, I’m glad that Shed brought this to our attention. I would not even have to known how to research something like that to see where their true interests lie.
Just playing devil’s advocate and for the sake of accuracy, HSUS mission is not rescuing animals, but legislating changes and working on increasing protections for animals on a statewide and national level. Having worked with HSUS on local situations, requirement being that law enforcement must invite HSUS and be pursuing legal charges, they then can come in and help. One huge situation in WV where they were asked and they came… they rented the entire state Fairground barns, brought in veterinarians, vet techs, supplies, feed, hay, etc. They over saw the placement of horses with various orgs. we’re talking about over 150 horses seized.
They have two shelters for horses, Black Beauty in TX and Duchess in OR, Black Beauty is associated with Doris Day Foundation and they were created to mainly take in PMU horses when the farms were shutting down in the US.
ASPCA is the one who has one shelter in NYC, horrible track record, got rid of their investigation unit, they are the ones who run the pitiful commercials with the sad puppy dogs acting like they have shelters all over needing your support… when all they are doing is raising funds for their very high kill shelter in NYC.
I don’t understand how many rescues pick the horses to rescue. I recently saw two horses posted for sale, that had decent weight and had been rode in the past for a couple hundred each. I was under the impression those were the types of horses kill buyers went for. I think a couple hundred each might be pricey for a kill buyer as there isn’t much margin but you get where I’m going.
The thing is that we can never save them all. No matter what Manson says, she didn’t make even a dent on slaughter or anything because no one person or rescue ever can. The best you can do is find your niche and rescue that way. If Mustangs are your thing, then stick to that, or if seniors are the what speaks to you, then that’s your niche. The KBs are not offering their meat horses to the public because they mostly have contracts to fill and that truck will be full no matter what. I’ve never really understood or even supported rescues going to auction, but I get why they do. It’s a funding thing.
No, they can’t all be saved and it’s kinda heartbreaking.
It is plain that the folks who pay for horses out of kill oens ARE financially supporting the ghouls who then turn around and drag more healthy, well trained horses to their nasty pens in their dirty trailers. They could not outbid good home bids without the backing of kill pen purchasers. I know the timing is not perfect but this is what the reality is for horses caught up in that world today.
Yes, we discovered that fact when HSUS told us they had to be asked in by the County, and the County informed us that because HSUS had left them in a bind before, they wouldn’t request their presence for anything again. (Keep in mind that this was going to be a mass seizure of equines.) in the end, very little was done and the hoarder packed up and moved to another state, where I haven’t heard whether she picked up where she left off there, or if she did eventually give up.
Hopeful this Congress man is successful in adding laws that really do make shipping horses from the US to other countries for the purposes of slaughter illegal.
https://www.bradenton.com/news/politics-government/article225285895.html
Thoughts?
I’ve always said that the SAFE Act is the way to effect real change for horses, but it’s only a piece of the puzzle. We will not rescue our way out of slaughter or neglect. We need cruelty and neglect laws with real teeth and then we need agencies will to enforce them. Having a horse is not a right for anybody.
Would you consider it humane euthanasia if you have enough drugs to kill 35 horses correctly, but instead spread the drug out giving each horse a smaller amount so you can kill 45 horses i stead of 35? Because this happened.
Same place also aims at an 80% euthanasia rate. Most of them very healthy. Jut need quality food and training. But they dont want to pay for auality food and training. They want to act like rescuers while instead having a large pit on the property with well over a hundred bodies in it. Because its cheaper to kill than to train and feed.
They pay their accountant who also happens to be on the board $3,000 per month. Oh, and they pay their kids and the accountants kids $10 per hour. And also get food for their animals for free from the rescues stack. And then they get free fencing around their property (and kids get paid to install it). And free plumbing to fields. And a barn. All while only signing a yearly lease. Oh, and the tractor that cost around $38,000. And fundraise for private trips. And I can prove it all. The founder stated in my presence “kids Horse + will pay you to work today.” And at minimum 4 board members are aware of the illegal happenings and approve of it. One has told me he is scared of eviction if he votes against them. He lives on one of the founders property. Another runs her own 501c3 and atated on that page she wants to have enough money to pay her kids. Once again, highly illegal.
And the RHI is a supporter of said rescue. And is in support of breeding rescue animals. They actually removed the no breeding part of the contract to be in the RHI. A RHI partner advertised a broodmare sound only because she has great lines.
Please let Shed know who this rescue is and provide the documentation. They need exposed
Is there an email address i can email screen shots too?
Shedrowconfessions@gmail.com
You can send them to my email here (shedrowconfessions@gmail.com) and I’ll try to pass the info along to the right people if you’d like.
Wow! <— Not in a good way. WTF??
This is exactly the case. Animal protection laws are very commonly ignored and the victims left to suffer the consequences. We once received a large number of neglected equines from a neighboring county (ours won’t do anything for horses). The AC officer there was terrific and had back up from the sheriff and county.
The person who inflicted this gross neglect was convicted, served no time, was not allowed to have animals in that county so she moved to the county next door and started up again. She never served any time or paid a dime towards the rehab of her horses. But she did threaten to kill all of the AC officer’s family and pets in front of her. Again, no consequences. Ending this ridiculous application of ‘law’ IS the key to change for animal welfare.
Ignored or they pick and choose. Pretty terrible that after a threat like that nothing was done and is carrying on with the same crap right next door.
Our local agency apparently isn’t above using a sad situation to garner a few Facebook funds themselves. They’ve gathered over $4,000 over a bag of puppies left in an obvious place to be found. A shitty move on the owners part but at least the bag wasn’t weighted down with rocks and dumped in a canal.
I’m no up on all my rules for relinquishing pets but I don’t think they make it easy nor do some rescues. I am by no means defending this persons actions. The point I’m trying to make is that RHI has a great opportunity with all their funding to do great things to help horses and the community but they’ve chosen crappy bed partners and our using shitty ethics.
Shari
Would that rescue group happen to be based in NJ? Just curious.
If you had read Shari’s comment carefully she stated the name of the organization right there.
That place is another fustercluck.
However, I didn’t realize that the founders actually had their own personal properties? I wonder how that happened since neither seemed to have any sort of a career, nor gainful employment,
HC posted pic of one of their horses mounting another…classy… they’re selling panels/feeders etc to ‘pay off Dr.Talbot & other vendors’
sooo money is going to a HC account then? Surely they’re keeping track of these ‘donations’…from people buying HC assets…to allegedly pay off HC debts?
‘Pay off debts’ sounds great unless of course you know that HC has raised money numerous times to pay off debts, vet, etc…. Sad to say, I’m pretty sure any vendor that is owed money is out the money owed to them. How do you think M is feeding the 20-30 hostage horses she dragged off of the ranch when she finally got evicted? Rational people who don’t have gainful employment don’t keep that many horses and other animals and expect other people to continue to foot the bill. Grifter for life about sums it up.
I have been trying to catch up. I see she has reared her ugly head again. She is probably high on something and amusing herself. There she goes again blatantly selling off HC equipment. How many times is Ste going to raise funds to pay off bills and I thought Talbot was paid. Of course, nobody is asking for bills or where they can send money directly. Nobody is asking how she is affording to feed the horses she kept. Way past time for her, and her cohorts, to be charged. Are their taxes filed yet?
The horse doing the mounting looks to be Chrome. The last round of t-shirt sales, they asked for the money to go on account at the feed store for Michelle specifically, so not sure why this round of grifting is all of a sudden to pay their bills. I wonder if it will pay off M’s judgement or fines?
yeah when charges are filed, it’ll be interesting if Manson & Romney Faye defend themselves as HC or if they’ll turn on each other & get their own attys? Hope to see some more names added to that lawsuit soon.
Manson has a history of turning on people and throwing them under the bus. I’ve always found it interesting that she doesn’t seem to have old friends beyond people she’s met in the last six years or so. Most people don’t cycle through friendships like that.
sickofscams I agree. They will turn on each other faster than they scammed thousands of dollars each Tuesday. Wait for it. Tick Tock. I can’t believe Rom scammer is able to adopt another child considering she currently has an active multi million dollar lawsuit against her. I wonder what she tells the child welfare agencies is her excuse is- ‘it’s the haters’ doesn’t work people with real common sense.
I find it more than troubling that she can’t seem to mention this new kid without mentioning Tanner and is even calling him `T3′ when his name actually starts with `S’. She’s a sick individual and it’s sad that just because a child has special needs they don’t seem to vet these homes better.
adoption agency just has to Google her & lawsuit/fraud articles come up…she’s very manipulative/calculated as well, so maybe she fooled them….wonder how she answers when they ask if she has no job, how does she support herself & current son?
I believe there is an income attached when you adopt or foster special needs children.
I find it very hard to believe Romney is able to adopt another Special Needs kid, or any kid. Wonder if that was through the County or a private agency. Doesn’t say much for their background checking process. A couple people I know that have taken kids, get benefits for them. I agree that is a source of income for her or is Mom still supporting them?
I know that the “humane society” i mentined earlier has 3 kids that they get $1200 per month for. The kids support the parents basically.
I’ve known of a few people that make a living fostering hard to place kids.
Shari
Ok the other group in NJ isn’t partnered with Right Horse. So it’s got to be the high kill horse shelter located in TN? Know their history and MOD quite well. Ugh.
Yes you do get a monthly maintenance for the child and also the child gets automatic Medicaid so it’s a win-win for everyone. Only for RS it’s even better because she gets sympathy and attention too. Not to mention the heroine she becomes in her own mind for getting paid to care for what is supposedly her own heart child. Disability = more money in the system. Each kid brings in a SSI check of at least $1000 which in Cali is not enough to live off of. I wonder if she gets food stamps too.
Who knows? Just feel sorry for the kids involved. She’s a shitty human being and an even worse parent.
interesting too is her persistent threats that HC adoption contracts are still valid
That’s just her last attempts at asserting control. Yes, the contracts are technically valid but they won’t be once HiCaliber loses it’s 501c3 and, no, she can’t assign those contracts to another entity. She would have a very hard time enforcing those contracts right now anyhow and it’s laughable that she even pretends to know where all the former HiCal horses are.
I agree with Shed. There have been other SoCal rescues that have dissolved, with horses out on adoption…..They basically said you can either return the horse or the horse is now yours- contract free.
Remember, M is ‘setting the bar’ on how to close a rescue down. Seriously, one of the funniest things I have ever heard out of that lie hole. I can’t wait until she’s arrested.
can’t wait til she’s arrested too. Another classic musing by M was that HC was far too progressive & ahead of it’s time for the rescue world. Barf.
M believes whatever she says I do think. She’s A-typical narcissist. So full of her own delusions.
Shed any idea how the horses are doing that are still stuck in her clutches? I really worry about them. Thirty horses with anyone who is unemployed is nerve-wracking enough, with her it’s even worse.
Business as usual. As long as she has stuff to sell, they should stay fed.
so is she saying the horses left are her personal horses or are they rescues or a mix? either way, her selling of rescue property cannot be used to feed her personal horses.
The horses she has left are her personal horses.
Oh, but keep on keeping on, Michelle. People are watching. And we are all waiting. Her brazen disregard for the law is like a present to those investigating. Tick tock. 😈
She doubts anyone is going to stop her so, yes, business as usual.
Calling all Judge Judy watchers.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9710490/?fbclid=IwAR1GEd-hctm3wS1Kj9ujSYNETfERZR3A_gLIzJQuD7Ij57FMnb39WBsM64Y
I’m sure this will be funny AF. I wonder if I’m unmasked! LOL
I’m hoping for an eye roll pointing towards Mags. I think those folks need a life outside of fb. As in step away from all social media……
Well, however it shakes out, it doesn’t really change things for me or this blog. I wasn’t there.
She just can’t stop with the “award winning writer” – I can only imagine how deeply she drilled that into the brains of the show’s staff.
Well, I’m going to start billing myself as a published author because I think Pasterfuck’s binder qualifies as publishing. I won an 8th grade creative writing contest so I’m technically award winning as well. Go me!
The preview had JJ demanding to know who the blogger is and that’s its defamatory. Of course, just a small part that could be misleading. Hopefully.
No clue. Maggot hasn’t called me up or sent me a social media friend request so I’m guessing she still has no clue.
The preview had JJ demanding to know who the blogger is and that’s its defamatory. Of course, just a small part that could be misleading. Hopefully. Just don’t get why it’s so important to know who you are. Unless someone’s feelings are hurt
It’s important to her because she’s butt hurt. She wants to be the one to unmask the blogger since she couldn’t break this story. I ain’t worried about it because I’m not Jen, never have been. I guess I’ll find out with the rest of you if the it plays out differently for ratings. Better stock up on popcorn!
I was surprised to see that clip. I figured JJ would throw Mag’s out on her “award winning” a$$.
It won’t change a thing for this blog because, as I have said, I wasn’t there. Blog is still up, including the screen shots of Maggot and Pasterfuck behaving badly. Looks like Maggot’s diet hasn’t been going too well though.
How and why did this end up on Judge Judy? What in the actual fuck?! With the asks for legal fees I thought this was going to be handled in a real court of law…not a circus for Jerry Springer castoffs.
Circus, that is exactly how I describe it, too. With Hicaliber and all the nut jobs in its orbit, of course this is where it would be handled.
Michelle should be busy packing again. I guess we’re waiting for the situation to become exigent to maximize donations though?
I have no idea. It wouldn’t have been my play.
I mean….it was smart on MR’s side because it’s not a real court of law and just arbitration. Which means it was dumb on JM’s part to agree to that because it’s not based on much real evidence. This was definitely a win as far as the HC crew having something to say “SEE WE WERE RIGHT” to show the VI’s, who are too dumb to realize they didn’t win a real court case.
Right about what though? It’s a TV game show and it’s all about the ratings. Even if she did know who I was it won’t change the truth. If anything, I might have more to say about Maggot. She should be happy I choose to remain anonymous.
They are pumping it up on the HC facebook so obviously they think they won. What they think the won or proved I have no clue, but the morons that follow them are eating it up.
And yet my blog is still up and nobody is contacting me about it.
And by “won” I mean they think they were right. Still no idea about what, though.
If Maggot won, I look forward to hearing about her donating her winnings to a worth rescue or even paying off some of her debts to others That would be awesome. I suspect she’ll blow her award on more camo for Pasterfuck and Doritos. Maybe she can can give her dogs a break and stop breeding the shit out of them.
I wonder if the village idiots are aware that a reality show arbitration circus isn’t the same as litigation in a real court? Maybe Angrid can figure it out and clue them in. Or maybe she can’t which would explain a lot about her actions.
The funny part is that it’s all over butt hurt which tells me that Maggot gives a great deal of a shit what I think, yet I still don’t give a shit what she thinks or says. Now I’m told she’s waving around some emails the producers gave her as some sort of proof and she’s lying her gigantic ass off saying the IP address proves who I am? I use gmail. Gmail resolves to wherever their servers are just like wordpress does. So matter who sends you an email from Gmail, the headers are going to show you where the servers are and not the author. Hopefully the next person she targets uses a real judge and courtroom and Maggot gets what’s coming to her.
Thank you continuing the exposure of these organizations and the background on them. I will say HiCaliber has left me weary. I can only take so much of this stuff. Between what is happening to our country and the animals, some days I feel at witts end. I rescued two horse. I will care for them for the rest of their lives. I will not ever let them get into.anybody else’s hands, just cannot trust enough of them.
I’m glad you voice your concerns as it helps me know who to support, and who not too. I so appreciate your persistence & perseverance!
Is it true that any money that is awarded on JJ is paid by the show?
Absolutely!!
Yes, I think so.
I saw Marge is being congratulated for the show that some have seen and people are saying “you busted her.” Who did she bust and why is she making this whole thing about HER? Just like a damn narcissist.
Well, she didn’t bust me because I wasn’t there. I was actually here posting on the blog while they were taping, but never let the truth get in the way, Maggot.
Poor JM – sounds like she will have more time in the courts. This whole thing is beyond stupid and I am surprised the courts would even entertain this.
Real courts won’t. This was a reality show. Just screen shot everything they are saying and send to Jen. Jen, not me.
Roses are red
With leaves that are green
Maggot is fat,
Ugly and mean
In a dress that looks like a tent
She is all injured and emotions all
spent
Pasterfuk’s just glad
That they now can pay rent
It must seem like a big victory
But it’s really “so what?”
There’s just no mending
A great BIG hurt butt.
At the end of the day
Judy tossed her a crumb
But sadly it can’t fix
Her enormous fat bum.
She’s still the same person
She was yesterday
Fat, ugly and mean
Just won’t go away.
LMAO!!!!! Brilliant!
Love it!
So a blurb popped up on my Facebook from TRH with $10,000 training grants.
“HOW WOULD YOU USE $10,000 ON HORSE TRAINING?
When the right horse finds the right person, it’s a magical moment. It’s a moment filled with the promise of a bright future, friendship and uncharted adventure. It’s a moment where a bond is forged between horse and rider as dreams come true. It’s a moment that wouldn’t be possible without the love, time and attention given to horses in transition by organizations like yourself.
We know each horse that comes into your care is unique and requires a specialized training approach, but most horses share the need for training before being ready for their next home. In fact, you might say that training is a key factor in getting a horse ready for a potential adopter to say, “be mine”. Training is essential to the long-term success of a horse and their new adopter.
We are awarding three organizations with a $10,000 training grant to help you do what you do best; help horses in transition.
Damn send button…
I’m beginning to really dislike the phrase “horse in transition” and I’m not even sure why. Maybe because they cherry pick these horses? The ones in real need seem to be over looked?
Hey Shed – Just wondering if there are more blogs in the works for TRH or did they send you legal documents to get you to stop?
No, legal documents and even if they did, I would’t give a shit. I’d be happy to do a blog on it but there is a Facebook group that is really involved and those ladies are a wealth of knowledge. There isn’t much to say that they haven’t.
Thanks for pointing me in the correct direction. I have been eating popcorn all day awaiting your response Shed in regards to this question.
No worries. Anything I would have to do on it right now would just be a summary and link them to that page anyhow. Those ladies have been on this for a long time. It’s been fun to watch Satan scramble and throw ole Gary under the bus.
Haha!! Yeah it has
What does Tara Sanders have to do with The Right Horse Initiative? Or are you just bringing her up because she’s pro-slaughter? Do you have any info on the whole Thompson Horse Lot vs Company thing? Is that all just smoke?
Can you please link to the facebook group you are talking about in regards to TRH?
SHe doesn’t have anything to do with RHI as far as I know. If you want to get up to speed with her shittiness, you can ask to join this group.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/692605220839937/